Arpegi

Chat => Debates => Topic started by: Mr.PowPow on May 02, 2012, 11:09:13 PM

Title: Are games an art?
Post by: Mr.PowPow on May 02, 2012, 11:09:13 PM
Ico and Shadows of the Colossus are two very underrated games. If I had to choose any game to win the debate of "Is gaming an art?" I would chose those two, they are very beautiful games. In looks and in story.
They are kind of well known, but not universally loved like they should be.
 
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 03, 2012, 10:21:37 AM
Ico and Shadows of the Colossus are two very underrated games. If I had to choose any game to win the debate of "Is gaming an art?" I would chose those two, they are very beautiful games. In looks and in story.
They are kind of well known, but not universally loved like they should be.
 
Yes gaming is an art. But it's more the graphics alone.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoBot on May 03, 2012, 01:47:25 PM
Ico and Shadows of the Colossus are two very underrated games. If I had to choose any game to win the debate of "Is gaming an art?" I would chose those two, they are very beautiful games. In looks and in story.
They are kind of well known, but not universally loved like they should be.
 
Yes gaming is an art. But it's more the graphics alone.

Final fantasy often makes great games shadowed...
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Zer0 da Shadow on May 03, 2012, 03:32:06 PM
Ico and Shadows of the Colossus are two very underrated games. If I had to choose any game to win the debate of "Is gaming an art?" I would chose those two, they are very beautiful games. In looks and in story.
They are kind of well known, but not universally loved like they should be.
Ico Most defiantly falls into these category, out of all the games i can think of it is the one that completly Fell under the raider in Last Gen gaming.

Also i see the Mother series being throw around alot and i must disagree with that. You Must remember that Mother 1 and 3 were never released in the US but had HUGE Critical Acclaim and popularity in Japan. When Earthbound came out it wasn't as popular (at the time) and stayed that way until titles like Final Fantasy VII made JRPG's mainstream. But now Earthbound has become pretty popular.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Mr.PowPow on May 03, 2012, 04:20:28 PM
Ico and Shadows of the Colossus are two very underrated games. If I had to choose any game to win the debate of "Is gaming an art?" I would chose those two, they are very beautiful games. In looks and in story.
They are kind of well known, but not universally loved like they should be.
Yes gaming is an art. But it's more the graphics alone.
You're implying that graphics alone make gaming an art? or make an artistic game? I must greatly disagree. Its what the game symbolizes and what its message is that makes it art. Sure the way the game looks plays an important factor, but its an equal balance of grace and beauty that makes it shine. I mean by those standards, the latest Final Fantasy's would be art due to their beautiful graphics and style, but sadly its story is lackluster and thats why the news ones will never be "Art". Play Ico and Shadow of the Colossus and you will understand.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 03, 2012, 04:24:13 PM
Ico and Shadows of the Colossus are two very underrated games. If I had to choose any game to win the debate of "Is gaming an art?" I would chose those two, they are very beautiful games. In looks and in story.
They are kind of well known, but not universally loved like they should be.
Yes gaming is an art. But it's more the graphics alone.
You're implying that graphics alone make gaming an art? or make an artistic game? I must greatly disagree. Its what the game symbolizes and what its message is that makes it art. Sure the way the game looks plays an important factor, but its an equal balance of grace and beauty that makes it shine. I mean by those standards, the latest Final Fantasy's would be art due to their beautiful graphics and style, but sadly its story is lackluster and thats why the news ones will never be "Art". Play Ico and Shadow of the Colossus and you will understand.

Err... I think you read over the "more" I said. And as retro gamer... an game is an art form... but the "art" of a game... Well, actually... It's how you look at it. Graphical designers see the graphics, music guys see the music... So yeah...
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Mr.PowPow on May 03, 2012, 04:29:16 PM
Ico and Shadows of the Colossus are two very underrated games. If I had to choose any game to win the debate of "Is gaming an art?" I would chose those two, they are very beautiful games. In looks and in story.
They are kind of well known, but not universally loved like they should be.
Yes gaming is an art. But it's more the graphics alone.
You're implying that graphics alone make gaming an art? or make an artistic game? I must greatly disagree. Its what the game symbolizes and what its message is that makes it art. Sure the way the game looks plays an important factor, but its an equal balance of grace and beauty that makes it shine. I mean by those standards, the latest Final Fantasy's would be art due to their beautiful graphics and style, but sadly its story is lackluster and thats why the news ones will never be "Art". Play Ico and Shadow of the Colossus and you will understand.

Err... I think you read over the "more" I said. And as retro gamer... an game is an art form... but the "art" of a game... Well, actually... It's how you look at it. Graphical designers see the graphics, music guys see the music... So yeah...
Nope, I didn't read over it, as I said "equal balance" in my post ;p
but didn't you think that even with things like Tetris and Pac-Man, the graphics could have been even worse and you wouldn't have cared? As its the feeling the game produces, rather than the look it shows. True, music is a cornerstone in successful games, I will admit. But like I said, its an equal balance of all things, when you obtain a game that is dominant in one or the other, it usually turns out pretty bad. Thats why I disagree that graphics is more important.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 03, 2012, 04:39:48 PM
Again, it's how you look at it. Yes, games are art to me... But it's more then the graphics... And I NEVER said that they need to be top notch... An anime style can do the trick too... Like take for example Okami. That is a beautiful game but is the best prettiest game of the market? I don't think so... It's getting close but HD and all... Yeah.

For me I look at the game as a whole... Does the game look nice, is the gameplay deep, is there a good story... Like elements that you look for in a movie or video... Everything needs to come together in one nice package. I once started to play a RPG ... I got bored because I found that the graphics were out of the theme.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Mr.PowPow on May 03, 2012, 04:44:10 PM
Again, it's how you look at it. Yes, games are art to me... But it's more then the graphics... And I NEVER said that they need to be top notch... An anime style can do the trick too... Like take for example Okami. That is a beautiful game but is the best prettiest game of the market? I don't think so... It's getting close but HD and all... Yeah.

For me I look at the game as a whole... Does the game look nice, is the gameplay deep, is there a good story... Like elements that you look for in a movie or video... Everything needs to come together in one nice package. I once started to play a RPG ... I got bored because I found that the graphics were out of the theme.
But are you not implying the same thing I was? That there needs to be an equal does of everything to make a game a piece of art? "everything needs to come together in one nice package".
Dominance of graphics= bad
Dominance of story=bad
Dominance of music= bad
But when you have an equal balance of all, then it mixes together and becomes an art form. The resulting game becoming something along the lines of Ico.

I think its strange to say that a game can be art if it has better graphics than it does story. Or better story and lackluster graphics. It needs to be balanced.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 03, 2012, 04:48:11 PM
I think its strange to say that a game can be art if it has better graphics than it does story. Or better story and lackluster graphics. It needs to be balanced.

Agreed. But I don't see how you can compare a story to the graphics... But you can say that the graphics don't set the tone that the story is trying to set.

Dominance of story=bad
Dominance of music= bad

But here I disagree.

Dominance of the story = visual novel
Dominance of the music = Music & rhythm games?
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoBot on May 03, 2012, 04:49:15 PM
tO BE FAIR, i THINK ANYTHING CAN BE CALLED ART. i MEAN, THERE HAVE BEEN PEOPLE WHO PUT i BEAMS (sorry caps lock) together and called that art.
Or, at a musium I went to was selling a white canvas (painted white) for $5000 because of its excellent art.... the actual meaning of 'art' could be losing meaning
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Mr.PowPow on May 03, 2012, 04:53:37 PM
I think its strange to say that a game can be art if it has better graphics than it does story. Or better story and lackluster graphics. It needs to be balanced.

Agreed. But I don't see how you can compare a story to the graphics... But you can say that the graphics don't set the tone that the story is trying to set.

Dominance of story=bad
Dominance of music= bad

But here I disagree.

Dominance of the story = visual novel
Dominance of the music = Music & rhythm games?
Well on the first point, I think you understood what I was getting at anyway. So I won't delve further into that one.
On the second point however, there is some logic to that, I will admit. But I'm trying to get away from specialization games such as visual novels and music games. Those games are art in their own respect.
However for games that offer both story, gameplay and music in relatively high doses, but are unbalanced (such as RPG's, Action games and some Beat'em ups) I think there needs to be more of a balance.
Visual novels arn't really trying to have great gameplay, they knowingly focus on visual and music. Music and rythem games knowingly understand that they will have a rather unattractive story, but its made up in the gameplay section.
But for games that try to have all of it, then balance needs to be applied to make it gaming art.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: BloodcatNS on May 03, 2012, 04:56:25 PM
Didja play Flower? Yeah. The story is poetic. Almost nonexistent, really. But it's still there. Despite that, the graphics and gameplay are top-notch.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Mr.PowPow on May 03, 2012, 05:00:17 PM
Well in summary I will accept Jonez's point that other games that specialize in certain things, can be gaming art in their own respect. Given that they excel in their specialization.

But for games that try to excel in absolutely everything (which is a common trait for RPG's) then I believe that everything needs to be equal, otherwise the aspects of the game will be all fighting for dominance and it will ruin the flow of the game. Not noticeably, but you won't walk away with the feeling of "Hey, that game is like.....amazing...truly amazing".
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: dark 5FVD on May 03, 2012, 05:00:43 PM
ofcourse it is an art. Not everybody nows how to make a decent game.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 03, 2012, 05:08:57 PM
Well in summary I will accept Jonez's point that other games that specialize in certain things, can be gaming art in their own respect. Given that they excel in their specialization.

But for games that try to excel in absolutely everything (which is a common trait for RPG's) then I believe that everything needs to be equal, otherwise the aspects of the game will be all fighting for dominance and it will ruin the flow of the game. Not noticeably, but you won't walk away with the feeling of "Hey, that game is like.....amazing...truly amazing".

Yesh. That's my point. This is how I look at games. The game must give you a good feeling... no matter how it does it.
Heck, if you don't like a certain game like... for me, for example, it would be a (sorry) fighting game... But that doesn't mean that the fighting games are no art. I am just not a part of the audience that considers it as an art.

But lets prove our point by asking the question once... "What could make a game different from arts?"
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: BloodcatNS on May 03, 2012, 05:21:09 PM
Well in summary I will accept Jonez's point that other games that specialize in certain things, can be gaming art in their own respect. Given that they excel in their specialization.

But for games that try to excel in absolutely everything (which is a common trait for RPG's) then I believe that everything needs to be equal, otherwise the aspects of the game will be all fighting for dominance and it will ruin the flow of the game. Not noticeably, but you won't walk away with the feeling of "Hey, that game is like.....amazing...truly amazing".

Yesh. That's my point. This is how I look at games. The game must give you a good feeling... no matter how it does it.
Heck, if you don't like a certain game like... for me, for example, it would be a (sorry) fighting game... But that doesn't mean that the fighting games are no art. I am just not a part of the audience that considers it as an art.

But lets prove our point by asking the question once... "What could make a game different from arts?"
Diversity.

Well in summary I will accept Jonez's point that other games that specialize in certain things, can be gaming art in their own respect. Given that they excel in their specialization.

But for games that try to excel in absolutely everything (which is a common trait for RPG's) then I believe that everything needs to be equal, otherwise the aspects of the game will be all fighting for dominance and it will ruin the flow of the game. Not noticeably, but you won't walk away with the feeling of "Hey, that game is like.....amazing...truly amazing".
Being too equal in its factors can make the game bland. Cliche. Common. It has to have something that can divert itself from its own genre. That doesn't necessarily mean that it HAS to sacrifice one aspect or another.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 03, 2012, 05:23:35 PM
Being too equal in its factors can make the game bland. Cliche. Common. It has to have something that can divert itself from its own genre. That doesn't necessarily mean that it HAS to sacrifice one aspect or another.

Don't forget the implementation... Like some cliches are SO overused but each time they find a different way to implement it... But if it's just a copy from the standards... Yeah, indeed then you have a bland, cliche, common game.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: CarolineJohnson on May 03, 2012, 06:00:37 PM
thatgamecompany. Nothing more needs to be said.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Kiss x Miz on May 03, 2012, 06:50:43 PM
Gaming isn't the same as making games. Your debate is invalid.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Mr.PowPow on May 03, 2012, 06:54:38 PM
Gaming isn't the same as making games. Your debate is invalid.
I'm sure if we changed the name of the thread, it could change that :p
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: CarolineJohnson on May 03, 2012, 07:38:20 PM
Gaming isn't the same as making games. Your debate is invalid.
Unless you're gaming to find what you want for your game you're making.

Or making a let's play.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: BloodcatNS on May 04, 2012, 03:09:30 PM
thatgamecompany. Nothing more needs to be said.
Trudat
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Kiss x Miz on May 04, 2012, 04:36:38 PM
thatgamecompany. Nothing more needs to be said.
Paradox Interactive
ArenaNet

have to be mentioned aswell :P
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: CarolineJohnson on May 04, 2012, 09:05:45 PM
thatgamecompany. Nothing more needs to be said.
Paradox Interactive
ArenaNet

have to be mentioned aswell :P

Were they actually trying to create art that is video games, though?
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: Kiss x Miz on May 04, 2012, 09:15:56 PM
Were they actually trying to create art that is video games, though?
Have you seen anything related to Guild Wars 2 yet? Everything looks like it's painted.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: CarolineJohnson on May 04, 2012, 09:30:40 PM
Were they actually trying to create art that is video games, though?
Have you seen anything related to Guild Wars 2 yet? Everything looks like it's painted.

I don't like Guild Wars, therefore I don't even know what the first game looks like.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: BloodcatNS on May 05, 2012, 04:14:49 AM
FLOWER! FLOWER DAMNIT!
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: CarolineJohnson on May 05, 2012, 06:05:24 AM
FLOWER! FLOWER DAMNIT!


I already suggested that when I said thatgamecompany.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 05, 2012, 05:24:41 PM
Okami. Already mentioned but still...
Limbo... That's one nice game too...
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: CarolineJohnson on May 05, 2012, 09:47:11 PM
Already mentioned but still...
Since we're mentioning already mentioned games, here is a list.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on May 06, 2012, 01:49:41 PM
What about Electroplankton for the NDS? Not really a game game but it's art non the less in my opinion.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: senpai_FisT on August 20, 2013, 11:00:12 AM
Bumping this.

It would pretentious to call myself a developer right now, so I'll just call myself a disciple in the game developing scene. I've been reading articles and books by famous and accomplished developers. There is huge difference in mentality of a gamer and a developer. Game devs consider games a product and the process of developing it as a service than making art. Whereas gamers take it and commences a "Game are art!!!" fight. Game developing is more akin to carpentry than an artist painting on his canvas or a musician writing symphonies. Arts & Crafts often gets lumped together, but they are quite different. Carpentry is more of a craft. You can put art into into it by chiseling the armrests and legs into intricate shapes but it's purpose remains the same--a seat to place your arse on. At the end of the day, it's no longer a chair if you can't sit properly on it. Then there are chairs which are chiseled to such a degree that even the seat is art. They don't serve their original purpose, now their purpose is purely to act as a medium of art.

That's where we get the fine line between game and art. A game that has little or no focus on gameplay but purely on it's artistic aspects, mainly it's story, music and artwork. Limbo is not art. It's a fine platformer with a noir like art design, much like the chair with a stable seat but artistically designed armrests I mentioned earlier. Whether a game is considered art is decided by its emphasis of art than its use of art. Corpse Party IS art. With it's emphasis on story, art, music and VA. What will happen is a division in the gaming scene. You'll have videogames and you'll have an arthouse gaming scene. You already have an arthouse scene but it's not as developed right now.

The main offenders in perpetrating this are:-
>Gamers who seek acceptance from people who dismissed them as "children".
>People who think art is the pinnacle of something's existence, or the universally accepted standard of something being profound by default. This one by far, I believe.
>Shigeru Miyamoto. I love him and his contribution to videogames, but people need to realize he only introduced art to videogames (Which was an important step in videogame history) and pushed it to the public, not make art itself. Maybe I should just write Nintendo fanboys, but hell.
>Your mother. Hue hue hue hue

TL;DR - Videogames can be a medium of art but it loses its defining qualities as a game in the process.  Essentially, it turns into art in a computer program. Also, many games that are considered art are actually, in fact, not.

P.S, famous people who disagree with games are art:-

>Roger Ebert: Well, this guy's not from the game industry, so I would take his input with a grain of salt.
>Shigeru Miyamoto: Needs no introduction. Nintendo fanboys touch themselves to a poster of Miyamoto every night.
>John Carmack: Wolfenstein, Doom, Quake. Father of modern FPS. Fans of modern FPS don't even know who this guy is since they're busy fucking your mom and doing 360 no scopes. Swag.
>Hideo Kojima: Creator and director of Metal Gear, which fanboys widely regard as "art".
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on August 20, 2013, 11:03:23 AM
Well actually the video for Nostalgia Critic sums up pretty much with what I think.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: BloodcatNS on August 20, 2013, 04:49:28 PM
TL;DR - Videogames can be a medium of art but it loses its defining qualities as a game in the process.  Essentially, it turns into art in a computer program. Also, many games that are considered art are actually, in fact, not.
The use of "art" in your argument feels rather subjective, if you don't mind me saying. (Then again, aren't all arguments?) But what really made me react in your statement is the fact that you said "many games that are considered art are actually, in fact, not.". It seems to say that the definition of art has some sort of guideline for it to be considered as such. Really, there isn't. Just like literature. Literature, which in itself is form of art, can be summed up as any written work in a certain time, place or language; basically, any writings that says anything about a culture. If that's so, then regardless of what the actual developers think, whether they like it or not, their games are forms of art, expressed by skill and imagination (Which, the latter isn't expressed much, unfortunately. We're plagued by endless waves of sequels.)
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: BloodcatNS on August 20, 2013, 04:50:11 PM
Well actually the video for Nostalgia Critic sums up pretty much with what I think.
We can't argue with something that some of us might not bother to watch. :(
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on August 20, 2013, 04:51:03 PM
Well, I talked to FiST and he said that what Doug said was pretty much what FiST wrote here.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: senpai_FisT on August 20, 2013, 07:29:49 PM
Well, I am being subjective about it. While "the arts" is a broad spectrum that technically anything includes by the human creative impulse, "art" is defined by its focus in its visual aesthetics. Literature is not art, it's part of "the arts". Same goes for music, film, drama and videogames.

The only thing that "Games are art!" says about you is that you're a graphics whore. Videogames started off purely as a craft. A means to a product that you can interact with and entertain yourself. During the mid 80's, games started being influenced by the arts. So I guess it's safe to call the current videogame industry an industry of applied arts.

(http://i.imgur.com/rpfDmvS.jpg)

Applied arts =/= Fine arts
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: O:\msg on August 20, 2013, 08:26:58 PM
Of course games are art. Not only do some look stunning but they tell a story, make you think and can affect your emotions too.
Title: Re: Are games an art?
Post by: NekoJonez on August 21, 2013, 11:02:02 AM
I think I wrote an article on ButtonSmashers about this.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal