So I was thinking about this the other day.
How about an Arpegi review team? Members of which write a review every week. This could also increase member participation in reviewing.
Or maybe an 'Arpegi's Hall Of Fame' where the review team chooses the games to be placed in it.
Here are my ideas.
>A team of 2~5 members who post reviews in a cyclic manner, where the review is written and the scores are decided by the writer than the entire team(I think this would be the best)
>Similar to first, but only the review is written by one person, the scores are decided by the entire team ( taking mean average or something)
>Certain rules to be satisfied before being inducted into the Hall of Fame, such as...I don't know, you tell me.
What are your thoughts?